Other photos are of the young seedling and Jamie and Jeannie Standley at the fall creek knapweed site. Notice the retaining wall in relation to the railroad tracks. We need to get rid of this infestation.








Recap on “Why spotted knapweed?”:
The Situation
• We do not have spotted knapweed in abundance in any once place.
• Summarized information about the seven generalized known locations in the state
• Summer of 2009 treatments will include:
• Need to monitor for at least eight years to ensure seed bank fully depleted. In general, successful control of the species at the site (eradication) will be considered as achieved when no occurrence of the species has been documented for five consecutive years of annual monitoring.
• Surveys for new populations (Spotted knapweed is probably better adapted to the interior boreal system, but it hasn’t shown up there yet). Perhaps a formalized statewide inventory and monitoring effort should be established. But until that occurs we need to stress citizen monitoring.
• Try to work with the Alaskan Railroad and the Department of Transportation on these weeds so that we can work safely at the site near the railroad bound by the retaining wall. Contact DOT and AKRR to see if those agencies would be supportive of our project.
• Michael Rasy suggested that a revegetation project would be appropriate on the
The Databases:
• All statewide data through 2007 is in AKEPIC.
•
• Must coordinate with both databases to ensure that all sites are identified and if new sites are found we need to readdress where the data is stored so we can be certain that information is recognized in this project.
• AKEPIC won’t include the large (0.5 acre infestation) they found in 2008 at Beluga Point. He did collect GPS data and submit it to AKEPIC, but that is not likely to be uploaded by now.
Additional Topics
• Plan work for 2010 to incorporate in the FS plan of work which would receive dedicated funding
• There is going to be a regional leadership team meeting on POW in September or October, include a trip to a spotted knapweed site or mention of the project.
Is hand pulling the appropriate control method for all the sites?
• Michael suggests that hand pulling has been quite effective.
• Trish noted that seed in the seed bank has been reported as being viable for up to 8 years.
• Hand pulls have gone on for 4 or 5 years at the Falls Creek site. There hasn’t been many working on these pulls, but the population is definitely been reduced. However, the seed bank still exists there so there is continued recruitment. The treatments have been done before the plants go from seed.
• It’s important to stay active in the pulling efforts and in surveys to find new populations.
• Michael suggests pulling the plants before they have gone to flower (mid to late June) and then return later in the season (late August, before going to seed) for a second pull. The Haines populations and the southcentral populations have reported similar stages for flower development.
• Melinda mentioned a population near
• Michael is willing to collect some seedling specimens and send them around. He says they are distinctive-looking.
• Michael Rasy feels that all the patches along Turnagain Arm can be handled by hand-pulling.
• All sites in southeast
• One of the sites off the